My View On...
 
Views,thoughts, current events, past events, social behavior, or whatever. M.A.G.A. means to me, "Make America Strong Again.
Keywords | Title View | Refer to a Friend |
Censorship because the art might trigger traumatic feelings
Posted:Jul 21, 2019 5:18 pm
Last Updated:Jul 22, 2019 2:04 am
163 Views
Censorship because the art might trigger traumatic feelings
There is a historically accurate, 83 year old fresco mural, portraying who George Washington was; soldier, surveyor, statesman and signer of the Declaration of Independence. Not a painting of a boy chopping down a cherry tree, though seemingly much more preferred by the lowbrow dolts who object to this mural. [See the picture of the woman with her mouth open.. no.. she doesn't see pie].

The mural, takes up 1600 square feet of a "High School" wall, near the main entrance. The mural depicts accurate historical scenes.

Mind you, this is not an Elementary School.

This place is "George Washington High School", grades 9-12, with two thousand and one students, who, in a matter of a short time will become legal adults.

Only 23 percent are, "People of color and many come from low income families", the reports have said, and I really don't know why that would make any difference, because , "History is history", regardless of income class and skin color!

If you ever get around to reading the public articles about this mural in the High School, you'll see in many articles they make a point, over and over again, of referring to the students who see this amazing fresco , as , "Historically marginalizing". As if to say, " We're sorry for showing our Countries history to you".

The protesters seem to insist this mural , everyday , over 83 years, has reminded , "Non white" High School students they come from , "Historically marginalized people".


But!! But this is a , "High School"! One step closer to college.

An institution of education. To learn and understand. A place for discussion. NOT an extension of kindergarten! [Take a nap, close your eyes, pretend something really didn't happen]....

In a small number of years these students will be applying to Colleges. Are we suppose to extend kindergarten safe-places into High Schools and Universities?! So students of higher learning won't feel emotionally harmed? Is that how this country is going to be now?!!! Just who is the dumbass who came up with that stupid plan?!

"The San Francisco Board of Education is charged with ensuring the well-being of all our students, academically, socially and emotionally, particularly those who have been historically marginalized"..... See that? "Historically marginalized". Why is the interviewee mentioning that? Was it required for a reporter to make their story? Answer: Probably was if the intention is to create public outrage.

The mural is not ABOUT racism. In the day, that was life in Colonial America. In fact in the mural there are British white guys. The Brits have plenty to be pissed off about General George Washington... the British history books have him written up as a terrorist. .........IT'S HISTORY FOLKS! We perceive, we learn , we understand and we move on.

Any cities Board of Education is to also be responsible for students to get an education , and in History studies, that means, "What really happened"...... Not , "George Washington chopped down a cherry tree" . Not , "Oh my, can't tell you about this, because you might feel bad".

Mark Sanchez, vice President of the school board, and a 3rd grade teacher , said students must walk by, and see these "Harmful" images [because it's located at the front entry of the school] . He said, "Painting it over represents not only a symbolic fresh start, but a real fresh start." ...pssst, Mark , this is a High School, not a class of 3rd graders.

I don't see how erasing history means a "Fresh start".
Of the students attending San Francisco's George Washington High School, today, there are 23 percent non-white-ish. But that percentage shouldn't matter if it was 23, or 65 percent, because "History" is "History". There is no erasing history for a "Fresh start". You learn, you understand and you move on.

And what of the other murals across the USofA , that were Federally paid for by President Franklin D. Roosevelt as this country was coming out of the Great Depression. Are these other murals safe?.....NO!!


The "Life of Washington" mural in San Francisco, is one of a series of New Deal-era murals that have been unfortunately successfully targeted by activists. [The "New Deal" was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1936. It responded to needs for relief, reform, and recovery from the Great Depression.]

The FDR-funded murals at the University of New Mexico have recently been covered up, while murals in both New York and Iowa have been vandalized.

All because of , "Changing sensitivities", is the fucking lame reason GIVEN for covering up, and vandalizing, amazing works of art that depict historical accuracy.

What else are we going to destroy, erase , cover up because feelings might get hurt?!!!! Yes, I'm damn angry! And so should you be. This erasing of history shouldn't be happening.



4 Comments
Nike, make the shoe... we'll be okay...
Posted:Jul 4, 2019 10:21 am
Last Updated:Jul 6, 2019 1:39 am
1100 Views
Why is this shoe being tunnel visioned as being offensive? It's a handsome shoe. stars representing the original colonies.
[ , if you count Nova Scotia, but don't, so the honor of went to Vermont , in 91.]

Betsy Ross and a handful of other Seamstresses sewed the first flag, although , "Supposedly", because there is a lack of historical evidence and lack of documentation supports this.

Kaepernick is entitled to his feeling of being "Offended", but does he have to ruin "Fun" others? ..No. He really doesn't. He, as anyone else, feeling , "Offended" [which means really nothing] could have sat at home and pouted.

Yes, a of moronic extremist opposed to diversity, appropriated the -star Betsy Ross flag, but who really attention to ? And most of them could have appropriated the Ford truck as their choice vehicle for getting around to meetings. Does somebody want to tell Ford to stop making trucks?

People need to stop being so easily offended about everything in history, stop demanding everything offends you, be removed....if allow these whiny people to remove everything, our society , more specifically, snowflake people, will have decimated our history, and really shouldn't allow to happen.

Write Nike and tell them , "Making the shoe is okay, 'll be fine."

...and happy 4th of July. Be safe. [Edit]...and one more picture; President Obama's inauguration two - star flags [Thirteen-star flags]hung all to see.


7 Comments
This is Spicy.....
Posted:Jun 30, 2019 5:15 am
Last Updated:Jul 6, 2019 2:31 pm
1071 Views
Because I say so... if you agree? Fine... If you don't? phttt
10 Comments
President Trump made extraordinary history..
Posted:Jun 30, 2019 5:10 am
Last Updated:Jul 22, 2019 5:18 pm
1101 Views
President Trump made history [again] by being invited to walk into North Korea .

Best President in a very long time.
12 Comments
"Dating" is an Adult Word with Adult Meaning
Posted:Jun 27, 2019 7:44 pm
Last Updated:Jul 4, 2019 2:18 pm
1116 Views
"Dating" is a word many seem to be confused about, and all too often used inappropriately.

For instance; when your year old has their first crush and wants to go together to the dance with their crush.
What do the parents say? For one thing they may say , "Enjoy your date". And that's how, "Dating" [to have sex], gets confused with , "Hanging ".

What was "Dating" before the concept of "Dating? ... Society used the word , "Courting". This was when sex, outside of legal marriage, was unacceptable. So a , "Courted", a female. They also called it, "Wooing" the woman.

Then what happened when sex was permissible outside of legal marriage? ...Men and women started, "Dating". A couple would go out and "Have sex". This is called , "Dating".

"Getting to know someone", is not "Dating", that's called, "Hanging out". Non sexual couple-activities is called, "Hanging out". Much less romantic, but much more accurate.

You do want to communicate better, don't you? So why not use the words of the times appropriately?

I googled, "What is the difference between dating and courting"... the answer given:

There Is A Difference Between Dating and Courting. ... Courtship is when a man is attempting to “woo” a woman, (to win her over) with the end result being marriage. Dating, by definition, is a social event whereby two people meet for companionship. This dating ritual is a part of the human mating process of the couple.Jul , 20.

So, "Meet", or ,"Hanging ", is what you do when getting to know someone.
"Dating", is a sexual activity.

What do prostitutes ask when they see a potential customer? They ask , "Do you want a date".

More proof , "Dating" means , "To have sex"? ... Ever been with a woman and she said, "This is not a date". What do you think she meant by that? Courting?
There won't be any sexual intimacy, you keep appropriate personal space distance away. ....Or you just off the "Date", and leave.

through some of the writings on this site.... Someone would mention they had a date the other night. They went to dinner and saw a movie. Then said ,"Nothing happened".

So it was intended to be a, "Date", to get some sex, but nothing happened. Was it still a "Date"? ... No. They just hung .
7 Comments
Summer Arrives in a Fun Way
Posted:Jun 22, 2019 6:18 pm
Last Updated:Jun 25, 2019 7:17 pm
1187 Views
In Seattle there is a great tradition welcome the return of summer, on the 21st of June. Not sure if other cities have a "Summer Solstice" type of event as Seattle.

What many forward , is the nude bicyclist parade, and seeing painted naked people, bold enough walk around among the crowed of dressed people.

And surprisingly enough, there were no visible stupid people fucking up the event, like you might expect when nudity is allowed in public. I found be cool.

Oh sure..among the few thousand people, there are 3 or 4 deeply offended religious fanatics [who should have stayed home praying], carrying signs saying, "Jesus is not mad at you".... ..... of course not!! ha... Jesus would have had a fucking good time!




9 Comments
Maybe we should have big warning signs ...
Posted:Jun 19, 2019 8:30 pm
Last Updated:Jun 20, 2019 1:54 pm
1287 Views

Weight gain is a serious matter, but societal etiquette [Political Correctness] is telling us, "Keep your thoughts yourself", do not speak up when those close us , like family, friends, lovers, are gaining weight. Also what about complete strangers? As a civilization, shouldn't we be helping each other, instead of turning a blind eye and withholding comment? ha.. except for ! They're honesty is pure and sharp... they'll point and say, " at the fat man/woman". Of course the parent, if parenting, says, "Hush, don't point, that's rude". .....Too bad that behavior was enforced as "Rude"for the last 70 years. Today, parents say, "That's inappropriate". ....I think it's quite appropriate. When a thinks you're fat, maybe you should pay attention? Yes?

Is the acronym [and subliminal concept] "BBW" doing more harm, than good, for women? [And likewise "BBM" for men, but you never hear/see "BBM" spoken/printed anywhere].

When I was in my early teens, I remember my parents telling my sister, "You're getting fat, stop eating so many cookies"..... that didn't crush her , that didn't cause her to yell back, "Stop bullying me". She just stopped eating too many cookies. Parents cut back on allowing her sweets, too. Peoples parents , decades ago, seem to be more watchful over their , back then.

On cigarette packages we have warning labels , so maybe in grocery stores [in the sweets/candy/bread/soda aisles, and bakeries, [ or any where products are sold we should have warning signs [big signs] hung close by, "Eating can cause obesity, heart problems, and diabetes". People don't read small signs, people almost never read the food labels either.
And maybe in restaurants , too, printed on menus, "To maintain proper weight, reduce your caloric intake". ...........So instead of a large pizza, you get a small pizza. Instead of allowing the wait-staff to place bread on your table as a snack , suggest maybe grapes.

What got me thinking on this as blog-note, was a commentary I copied from somewhere [ I think from a large woman's blog..not sure], sometime ago. It read:

""..I went to the grocery store at 8 am. I was standing in the ice cream isle and a in their mid 30's were also for ice cream, well the woman was lol. The woman picked a tub of ice cream and when she put it into their cart I heard the man say " Do you think you need that? You have 3 containers at home" I heard him and i looked at her. She was PISSED!! I watched her open the freezer door and put more tubs of ice cream in their cart!! I got my ice cream and went in , they came behind me in . I started kind of laughing, trying hide my laughter and the woman said him, "see, this lady heard you and she is laughing at you". I turned around and said him "I wish you luck on your drive home because you're going for much more than ice cream" and I laughed. The woman replied "that's for damn sure" We wished each other a good day ""

That was supposedly funny, the woman's husband going home with his pissed off wife. ....I thought it was sad. Sad that he put up with that from his wife, and put up with the snickering of the woman in line. If , indeed, he was paying for the food, he should have told the clerk, "Not the ice cream, my wife needs to diet".
6 Comments
Do our and grandchildren really need to learn about gender fluidity..
Posted:Jun 18, 2019 4:31 pm
Last Updated:Jun 22, 2019 5:57 pm
1453 Views
... a nonsense concept anyway..

How impressionable are infants and ? Science says, "Very impressionable" . Between infant stage and adolescence is when we develop our basic imprinting. Meaning, who , or what, we are attracted to in life, or want to be when we grow up.

Take a , boy or girl, to see a Spiderman movie, the wants to wear a Spiderman costume. Sometimes, wearing a costume allows a person to tap into confidence they didn't know they had, and helps them overcome shyness. The is developing [in part] who they will become, by wearing , and pretending , in the costume.

So why are parents reasoning, taking their to a, "Drag queen story time", in a public library, is a good idea?

Anna , creator of the Facebook group, "500 Mom Strong", has spoken out against Drag Queen Story Hour. She has said, "Drag is extremely offensive to women". "We should not be teaching [male] that dressing like a woman is okay to mock women". I would say, "We should not be teaching our male that dressing like women is okay".

Some of the other augments against this national event have been adults yelling Biblical stuff.
To me, the Bible thumpers have a weak base for their argument, because this only comes down to one, "Nonsense-mind washed", arguing against, the "Mentally confused".

The pro statements for the event, "Events are designed to promote gender diversity, inclusiveness, and providing with LGBTQ role models." " are able to see men who defy rigid gender restrictions and imagine a world where people can present as they wish, where dress up is real." ................ [Call Protection Services]. That quote, reminds me of something M. Jackson said when defending himself in court.

are not going to conceptualize , "Hey these grownups are defying rigid gender restrictions". ...fuck no! This nonsense is done by adults who should be locked up for the mental abuse of a /contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

Do really need LGBTQ role models?

These men dressed as women are said to be ,"Entertainers and have a right to perform in public". ....Okay...so maybe the Library should have female Strippers come to the Library and read for , dressed in their Strip wear. They're Entertainers, too. Maybe your daughters/grand daughters will role model a Stripper.





9 Comments
Can't call the Bureau before listening.
Posted:Jun 15, 2019 3:43 pm
Last Updated:Jun 17, 2019 4:30 am
1436 Views
I just knew some would misquote President Trump , yet again due "Fake news".

misreports in his blog: "Just when you think the Trump cannot go lower, he does. Now Trump says he see nothing wrong with getting opposition dirt on competitors from Russia or other foreign sources. He would not report them to the FBI.

That was not what President Trump said to George Stephanopoulos.

POTUS said [to George], "I think I'd do both [listen and the FBI] , there's nothing wrong with listening. If somebody calls from a country, Norway, we have information on your opponent..Oh.. I think I'd want hear it" ..."It's not interference, it's information, I think I'd take it. If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go to the FBI" .....That's what he said.

Then he went on explain "Opposition research" George.

Basically POTUS said he'd listen then call the FBI. Now the Democrats are twirling and fro ...yet again...crying for impeachment..... wasting tax payers on made up charges and pretend investigations, and being hypocritical, as usual.

[Notice abc says in the picture, "I think I'd take" < that is fake news, because that is not all that POTUS said.]
7 Comments
Snowflake Society....
Posted:Jun 12, 2019 11:22 pm
Last Updated:Jun 21, 2019 10:37 pm
1500 Views

For a very Snowflake reason, Miley Cyrus is making amends for an answer regarding how she feels about making "Hip Hop" influenced music. [And I use the word , "Music" oh so very vaguely. ]

The article calls Cyrus's answer, a "Controversial comment". I call it, "No big deal".

Cyrus criticized the genre [Hip Hop] in a 20 interview, claiming rappers' lyrics were too lewd and saying, "I can’t listen to that anymore. That’s what pushed off the hip-hop scene a little."

Can't an entertainer be honest like that, any more?

Then some person, known as YouTuber Kenya Wilson, said about the interview, "It wasn't the right thing to say, it was bad, it was racially insensitive, it had racist undertones and it wasn't OK, point blank, period."

"Racially insensitive", "Racist undertones", "Point blank period", LOL.....Are you fucking kidding me?!!

The Political Correctness virus has seriously messed up the people, and these fuckers will be having of their own one day. [maybe]..Seems now we have to agree with everyone, and everyone gets a gold star, no bad words!!
6 Comments
An Observation of Nonsense
Posted:Jun 12, 2019 10:43 pm
Last Updated:Jun 14, 2019 9:30 pm
1454 Views
Apparently if you say, [and I quote], "No , but thanks for asking", you get blocked.

The question was, would you like to play with her boobs.

I really don't know why I would want to "Play" with her pair of boobs. That seems childish.

Are men always expected to say, "Yes", to that question? Saying, "No" , apparently gets a person blocked.
7 Comments
75 years later, the sun sets on D-Day
Posted:Jun 6, 2019 9:48 pm
Last Updated:Jun 22, 2019 4:22 am
2022 Views
Normandy, France on a sunny day. Such a contrast to June 6th, 75 years ago.
For those remaining heroes who made the journey for this day of commemoration, now in their 80's and 90's, this will be their last visit.

My dad fought in WWII, he had buddies who this beach and he never heard from them again.

I watched CNN and Fox News, I was watching President Macron, and President Trump, in Normandy, give their speeches. Not long , not short. Just perfectly.
I thought President Trump did an outstanding job commemorating the memory of the heroes who sat behind him , on the honor stage, and those that laid at final rest close by.




6 Comments
Should men have the option to not pay support? Yes.
Posted:Jun 3, 2019 10:54 pm
Last Updated:Jul 1, 2019 8:41 pm
2405 Views
Paying support should be an option. Not mandatory by law.

Generally, who will choose not to pay support? Men [mostly] whom a woman should have thought harder about getting married to, and/or having [with].

No such thing as deadbeat dad unless a woman makes a deadbeat dad, by mating with a deadbeat.

In the 1990's if a woman and man have sex [dated], and she says she is using birth control, but really isn't, she has the right to raise the without his knowing he even has as a , and then to sue him for retroactive support, even 10 to 20 years later. That man should not be held legally responsible for any payments whatsoever.

Women can trick or r*pe a man, or a male minor , and he could be held legally responsible [liable] for providing monetary support. Courts have ruled that way.
But the court has also ruled, [for the woman] if the sexual intercourse results in the birth of a is involuntary , or without consent, a woman may have just cause for refusing to support the .

Apparently in the U.S. , "The best interest of the ", [when it comes to support] only applies to the male.

Not only are men responsible for whom they did not consent to fathering, but the male is also responsible for whom are not even his genetically.

Apparently then , women have reproductive rights , men have responsibilities. And that's just wrong.
4 Comments

To link to this blog (Heathen_G) use [blog Heathen_G] in your messages.

  Heathen_G 60M
60 M
July 2019
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1
 
2
 
3
 
4
1
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
1
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31
 
     

Recent Visitors

Visitor Age Sex Date
Lilmissdixie37  38/37C7/23
EaglesfanwithBBC  25M7/22
Tmptrzz 56F7/22
Paulxx001  62M7/21
positively4you 69F7/21
smallballs555  64M7/21
jonm1234 74M7/21
dogslife2live01  67M7/21
BOOBOO4U22  46M7/21
scoupe42 56M7/20